It may be that the lectionary has presented us today with a quintessentially Anglican passage from Scripture. When we are asked, what do Anglicans say about any number of issues, the answer is usually, “Well, it could be this or it could be that.” To some, this sounds mealy-mouthed, but when your way of being Christian is a via media, easy answers are rare.
At our best, we Episcopalians in the Anglican tradition are naturally reticent. At our best, we embody a holy humility. If God is God, then there is very little we can say with certainty about him. This is not a stance of avoidance but a respect for God’s transcendence and our own frailty.
Now, we might be a people of the via media, or the middle way, but we are perhaps more intensely a people of the via negativa, the negative way. This is the ancient Christian tradition of seeking to draw near to God by refraining from saying too much about him or by only saying what God is not. Because, God, after all, is ultimately beyond our knowing. And who better to sum up this via negativa than the great Anglo-Catholic poet T.S. Eliot.
In his poem “East Coker” from The Four Quartets, Eliot says the following, echoing the sixteenth-century mystic St. John of the Cross.
“In order to arrive there,
To arrive where you are, to get from where you are not,
You must go by a way wherein there is no ecstasy.
In order to arrive at what you do not know
You must go by a way which is the way of ignorance.
In order to possess what you do not possess
You must go by the way of dispossession.
In order to arrive at what you are not
You must go through the way in which you are not.
And what you do not know is the only thing you know
And what you own is what you do not own
And where you are is where you are not.”
Eliot’s poem demonstrates the circularity of this way of thinking, which is frustrating to some. Perhaps you have felt like a broken record when yet another person asks for a clear stance on some complicated issue. When you seem to vacillate, you are actually being as honest as you can. This is often what it feels like when we try to say anything about God.
We might seem to be caught in a carousel of the via negativa when we try to make sense of Jesus’ encounter with the wealthy man in today’s Gospel passage. Jesus offers a blunt assessment of wealth and money in relation to the spiritual life. It seems rather plain in the end. But a closer reading of the text beckons us to eschew a simplistic reading. I’m going to complexify this text because that, I believe, is where it’s true meaning lies. Now, I really sound like an Anglican, don’t I?
Yes, this passage is about possessions and how they can become baggage in the spiritual life. As T.S. Eliot puts it, “In order to possess what you do not possess/You must go by the way of dispossession.” But Jesus also intimates that his words are about much more than material possessions and wealth. So, if we want to distill one maxim from Jesus’ words today, and to riff on T.S. Eliot’s words, we might say, “To gain what is impossible, we must let go of what is possible.”
Isn’t this what Jesus suggests? For mortals salvation is impossible, but for God, all things are possible. It’s vexing to encounter these words. We are left with a desperate hopelessness that we have been given no clear clues towards attaining salvation. There is, in fact, nothing we can do to attain it. And this is precisely the point. “To gain what is impossible, we must let go of what is possible.”
What is possible for the rich man are those things that, in some sense, are easy to accomplish. Do not murder. Do not commit adultery. Do not steal. Do not bear false witness. Do not defraud. Honor your father and mother. And like the rich man, we might easily say, “Jesus, I have kept all these things from my youth.” But, as Jesus says, this is not enough. “To gain what is impossible, we must let go of what is possible.”
For the rich man, what was possible was to keep all the commandments and to check all the boxes in his spiritual life. And even though he seemed to shirk the charge to sell all that he had and give the money to the poor, perhaps even that action would have been possible for him had he persevered. And yet, based on his own efforts, he would nevertheless have fallen short of that impossible eternal goal of salvation.
This passage is not so much about the things we hoard and treasure. It’s about using those things, whether it’s money or our charitable works, to earn something that can only be a gift from God. And the only way to inch closer to receiving God’s gift of salvation is to let go of what is possible so that God can give us the impossible, which is eternal life with him. The things that are possible may be good and even necessary in our lives of discipleship, but God demands something more for salvation.
It may be that you have come here today longing for the final word on riches and possessions. Maybe you want the reassurance that hanging on to your wealth is really no impediment to discipleship. Maybe you want someone to tell you quite clearly that you must give it all up in order to follow Jesus. But I suspect that, in the end, when we desire the neatly packaged recipe for the path towards salvation, Jesus will always tell us that we still lack one thing, and that one thing might be a sense of holy humility. It might be that we lack a tolerance for the discomfort of not always knowing the answer when it comes to God. It might be that we lack a willingness to let go of what is possible for us, because what is possible for us becomes the way of controlling our own salvation.
It is true that for many, wealth and riches become a stumbling block in the life of discipleship. It is true that for others, it’s their pride, their envy, their resentments, their judgment of others. For some, it’s their dutiful obedience in taking all the right steps into heaven. The truth is that it’s different for every single person. For “to gain what is impossible, we must let go of what is possible.”
And frankly, this may not seem like good news. We may feel as if we are playing a cruel game that we can never win, like one of those claw machines in an arcade that never seem to pick up the toy you desire, no matter how much money you put in. God can seem like a hungry beast that we must constantly feed but who never gives us the salvation we long for.
But this misses the point. The hungry beasts that strip us dry but offer nothing substantive in return are those voices among us that demand our money in exchange for status. The hungry beast is the world in which one’s value is based on achieving an impossible goal of perfection. The hungry beast is the vast amount of material need that we think we can satisfy on our own to gain our salvation. But all these endeavors fall short and take something of our souls, because, in the end, it’s not possible to earn our way into heaven.
But Jesus tells us that “to gain what is impossible, we must let go of what is possible.” Sure, we can bone up our resumes, fill up our individual treasure houses, and fake our perfection. But we will gain nothing for it, and we might even lose our souls. It is true that following the possible commandments of God is a necessary part of Christian discipleship, but the impossible way of salvation is a mystery given only by God.
To gain the impossible, is to let go of the possible dream that we can ever be finished with the life of discipleship. It is to give up the easy answers that are peddled in so many churches. To quote T.S. Eliot, it’s “to go through the way in which you are not.” To be certain of our futures and to have all the answers on how to find salvation is like a camel trying to go through the eye of a needle.
The task Jesus has given us, to gain the impossible by letting go of what is possible is not a trap. It is a gift. If we can accept it, God will accept us where we are and then show us the way to eternal life. We can’t show ourselves into heaven. For us, it’s an impossible task, but for God, all things are possible.
Sermon by Father Kyle Babin
The Twentieth Sunday after Pentecost
October 10, 2021
